Ah, the nominalist’s spoilt child. Though I’m sure you didn’t mean it that way.

“and finally i was away those 3 minutes giving birth to a new man U fan…”

A sperm donor, eh. Page 3? And 2 minutes longer than usual.

and finally i was away those 3 minutes giving birth to a new man U fan…

Hm. It took you 3 minutes to think that up?

Don’t be silly. It wouldn’t say that even if it should. And it wouldn’t need to be said as folk would know it anyway.
United earned their spending power, City didn’t. This is an important difference. It isn’t bias just fact.

I’m afraid it does matter. There will always be a tale behind those facts in a book. And it will always be asked about.
On your “at last a sensible post” remark? You just stick to the compliments.

Of course City are a big club in English football terms. It’s not about that, just the notion you and others have of becoming bigger, of overtaking United, Arsenal, and Liverpool all of whom are bigger clubs than yours and always will be. You might be able to level up to Chelsea, a club in my opinion possessing comparable past status to yours.
The spread of mass media in the late 50s and throughout the 60s – along with that era’s seismic culture changes – allowed ordinary folk access to a football knowledge not seen before.
These eras are the times when, primarily, true legendary status was awarded nationwide, European-wide and to a degree worldwide to certain clubs. This effect is unchangeable in the lifetimes of you and I, for example. It evolved from a mixture of success highlighted in this mass media, the individuality expressed by certain players along with the style of football played. There are other reasons like how this seeped elsewhere demographically.
But the bottom line is that no matter who is the richest and/or whether they can dominate for the next ten years, say, the status of the club’s I name will not change.
If any of these can be accused of losing their “soul” the point is, in being awarded high status (someone HAS to be the biggest as it’s human nature to give rank) back then, the cocktail of reasons for it included “soul” at least in some sense. You’ll not see this again. Because these factors were unique, it is indelible.
No-one other than City fans and their convenient adherents at this time from other clubs, will accept City becoming bigger because they will simply see any future success as bought, in toto. Outright.
You can win everything in the next ten years but your status relevant to (at least) United, Arsenal and Liverpool will not alter.