<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RoM Reads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therepublikofmancunia.com/rom-reads-9/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/rom-reads-9/</link>
	<description>a Manchester United blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:09:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: singh7</title>
		<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/rom-reads-9/comment-page-1/#comment-66345</link>
		<dc:creator>singh7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therepublikofmancunia.com/?p=11860#comment-66345</guid>
		<description>Just read Vital football Chelski blog and they were commending the age restriction policy that we have.They wished they had something similar... (God knows they need it) LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read Vital football Chelski blog and they were commending the age restriction policy that we have.They wished they had something similar&#8230; (God knows they need it) LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manu</title>
		<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/rom-reads-9/comment-page-1/#comment-66337</link>
		<dc:creator>Manu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therepublikofmancunia.com/?p=11860#comment-66337</guid>
		<description>I am not sure it is a smoke screen. I do think the resale value theory is just complete non sense. United dont sign players so that they can sell at a higher price. I do think if the policy is indeed true, it is Fergie planning long term to make sure that when he leaves United, the person taking over has the best possible state. I am think of it, Fergie will be around for say atmost 2-3 years? The younger players we have now will be hitting their best forms and any new players would fit that as well. Following on from that, I do think Berbatov was signed to replace Ronaldo in  a way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure it is a smoke screen. I do think the resale value theory is just complete non sense. United dont sign players so that they can sell at a higher price. I do think if the policy is indeed true, it is Fergie planning long term to make sure that when he leaves United, the person taking over has the best possible state. I am think of it, Fergie will be around for say atmost 2-3 years? The younger players we have now will be hitting their best forms and any new players would fit that as well. Following on from that, I do think Berbatov was signed to replace Ronaldo in  a way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ¡No Pasarán!</title>
		<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/rom-reads-9/comment-page-1/#comment-66336</link>
		<dc:creator>¡No Pasarán!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therepublikofmancunia.com/?p=11860#comment-66336</guid>
		<description>i was the second shooter on the grassy knoll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was the second shooter on the grassy knoll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanj</title>
		<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/rom-reads-9/comment-page-1/#comment-66334</link>
		<dc:creator>sanj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therepublikofmancunia.com/?p=11860#comment-66334</guid>
		<description>another reason i agree is the purchase of berba, i find it too easy to say he is merely an exception, especially when spurs were driving the price up constantly. if they were following this new age policy, united would have told levy to f*ck off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another reason i agree is the purchase of berba, i find it too easy to say he is merely an exception, especially when spurs were driving the price up constantly. if they were following this new age policy, united would have told levy to f*ck off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanj</title>
		<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/rom-reads-9/comment-page-1/#comment-66333</link>
		<dc:creator>sanj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therepublikofmancunia.com/?p=11860#comment-66333</guid>
		<description>penguin, i agree with your smokescreen theory. no one knows how to play games like sir alex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>penguin, i agree with your smokescreen theory. no one knows how to play games like sir alex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penguin</title>
		<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/rom-reads-9/comment-page-1/#comment-66331</link>
		<dc:creator>Penguin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therepublikofmancunia.com/?p=11860#comment-66331</guid>
		<description>Well, he was great both seasons so there was no need to draw the contrast!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, he was great both seasons so there was no need to draw the contrast!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/rom-reads-9/comment-page-1/#comment-66329</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therepublikofmancunia.com/?p=11860#comment-66329</guid>
		<description>Penguin United article is shit. All that and not one mention of Rooney!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Penguin United article is shit. All that and not one mention of Rooney!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theboogeyman</title>
		<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/rom-reads-9/comment-page-1/#comment-66326</link>
		<dc:creator>theboogeyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therepublikofmancunia.com/?p=11860#comment-66326</guid>
		<description>I never thought about it that way.Good article,by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought about it that way.Good article,by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penguin</title>
		<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/rom-reads-9/comment-page-1/#comment-66325</link>
		<dc:creator>Penguin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therepublikofmancunia.com/?p=11860#comment-66325</guid>
		<description>For my part, I think the under-26 policy is a smokescreen, designed to bring down asking prices for established players and pour cold water on the rumour mill.

I&#039;ve set out my conspiracy theory in full &lt;a href=&quot;http://penguinunited.blogspot.com/2009/06/another-view-on-under-26-policy.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For my part, I think the under-26 policy is a smokescreen, designed to bring down asking prices for established players and pour cold water on the rumour mill.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve set out my conspiracy theory in full <a href="http://penguinunited.blogspot.com/2009/06/another-view-on-under-26-policy.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
