<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ronaldo&#8217;s Dive: Can it be justified?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified</link>
	<description>a Manchester United blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:03:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertonaldo</title>
		<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertonaldo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/#comment-1014</guid>
		<description>I ask for to protection the CR7!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ask for to protection the CR7!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/#comment-1004</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/#comment-1004</guid>
		<description>All I could think of watching those videos is,

&quot;FUCK YOU!!!! FUCK THE WHOLE LOT OF YOU!!! FUCK YOU PlAYERS, FUCK YOU REFEREES, FUCK YOU FA!!!&quot;

i was completely enraged by half of the tackles I had just seen on those videos. Watching them live, I was probably infuriated as well; but my anger and frustration boiled over watching all these horrid, fucking horrid tackles at once.

Of all these tackles, you could safely bet that at least half of the offenders had malicious intent. Most deserved bookings, and at least a third of them, red cards. But how many of those bastards were actually sent off?

I&#039;m really disgusted by the downright violent behaviour of those players. It wouldn&#039;t even be fair to describe such tackles as &quot;unsporting&quot; or &quot;dirty&quot;- it&#039;s downright criminal! Granted, there are some players who would have been thugs had it not been for football bailing their asses. This does not make their behaviour acceptable, but in the context of criminal psychology, their violent disposition is understandable. (Still, burn in hell, fuckers, nitwits, assholes!)

But isn&#039;t that where the referee steps in? Aren&#039;t referees supposed to ensure sporting behaviour and uphold the decency and repute of the game? WHERE HAVE THEY BEEN? WHAT HAVE THEY BEEN THINKING? We all know Ronaldo&#039;s notoriety precedes him on the field. BUT SURELY, they couldn&#039;t possibly have missed all those tackles?

And if referees are culpable, more so the FA. Time and time again, the FA have chosen to ignore all these unacceptable fouls on Ronaldo. How can Michael Ball&#039;s stamp on Ronaldo not possible be reviewed? WTF are the FA doing? WHO THE FUCK ARE THEY ANYWAY? (You can be damn sure of what would happen if it were a Man Utd player on the giving end.) 

And that&#039;s why I&#039;m so damned angry. It may not necessarily be the case, but it seems that the whole footballing world (save for Utd/Portugal) has conspired against Ronaldo. I demand from the FA and their cronies in black: Cut him some slack; protect him from the menace that is thuggish football players; punish severely those who have committed unforgivable fouls.

Until then, I don&#039;t care how Ronaldo cheats and dives. As far as I&#039;m concerned, he deserves a break from opposing players and referees. He&#039;s definitely not getting it. 

So til then, please do as you please, Ronnie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I could think of watching those videos is,</p>
<p>&#8220;FUCK YOU!!!! FUCK THE WHOLE LOT OF YOU!!! FUCK YOU PlAYERS, FUCK YOU REFEREES, FUCK YOU FA!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>i was completely enraged by half of the tackles I had just seen on those videos. Watching them live, I was probably infuriated as well; but my anger and frustration boiled over watching all these horrid, fucking horrid tackles at once.</p>
<p>Of all these tackles, you could safely bet that at least half of the offenders had malicious intent. Most deserved bookings, and at least a third of them, red cards. But how many of those bastards were actually sent off?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really disgusted by the downright violent behaviour of those players. It wouldn&#8217;t even be fair to describe such tackles as &#8220;unsporting&#8221; or &#8220;dirty&#8221;- it&#8217;s downright criminal! Granted, there are some players who would have been thugs had it not been for football bailing their asses. This does not make their behaviour acceptable, but in the context of criminal psychology, their violent disposition is understandable. (Still, burn in hell, fuckers, nitwits, assholes!)</p>
<p>But isn&#8217;t that where the referee steps in? Aren&#8217;t referees supposed to ensure sporting behaviour and uphold the decency and repute of the game? WHERE HAVE THEY BEEN? WHAT HAVE THEY BEEN THINKING? We all know Ronaldo&#8217;s notoriety precedes him on the field. BUT SURELY, they couldn&#8217;t possibly have missed all those tackles?</p>
<p>And if referees are culpable, more so the FA. Time and time again, the FA have chosen to ignore all these unacceptable fouls on Ronaldo. How can Michael Ball&#8217;s stamp on Ronaldo not possible be reviewed? WTF are the FA doing? WHO THE FUCK ARE THEY ANYWAY? (You can be damn sure of what would happen if it were a Man Utd player on the giving end.) </p>
<p>And that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m so damned angry. It may not necessarily be the case, but it seems that the whole footballing world (save for Utd/Portugal) has conspired against Ronaldo. I demand from the FA and their cronies in black: Cut him some slack; protect him from the menace that is thuggish football players; punish severely those who have committed unforgivable fouls.</p>
<p>Until then, I don&#8217;t care how Ronaldo cheats and dives. As far as I&#8217;m concerned, he deserves a break from opposing players and referees. He&#8217;s definitely not getting it. </p>
<p>So til then, please do as you please, Ronnie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mufcjoe</title>
		<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>mufcjoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/#comment-999</guid>
		<description>I think that Ronaldo is wrong to dive, but, nstead of punishingnhim the FA should look at the incidents shown here and protect him more. And btw, is Hleb injured because of the &quot;scar&quot; left on him, a tiny little cut? If so, then he should be protected but he is a puff anyways. Top article Scott needs publishing, can you not put it in some local papers to sell it to bigger papers or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Ronaldo is wrong to dive, but, nstead of punishingnhim the FA should look at the incidents shown here and protect him more. And btw, is Hleb injured because of the &#8220;scar&#8221; left on him, a tiny little cut? If so, then he should be protected but he is a puff anyways. Top article Scott needs publishing, can you not put it in some local papers to sell it to bigger papers or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dion Georgiou</title>
		<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/#comment-982</link>
		<dc:creator>Dion Georgiou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/#comment-982</guid>
		<description>I told my cockney red mate when he started moaning after the Fulham incident that Ronaldo would have got the penalty if he&#039;d bothered to even try and chase the ball after he&#039;d knocked it wide of Niemi, instead of continuing running in the direction of the keeper while looking straight at him. It&#039;s an ambiguous thing, what if a player&#039;s played for the penalty but his opponent has nonetheless ended up obstructing him? I think even if Niemi had made contact, Ronaldo was so uninterested in getting the ball that a penalty would have been harsh. However, other players may have gotten it because they didn&#039;t have Ronaldo&#039;s reputation. But as the Derby incident shows, it is one that he is to blame for. There was absolutely no need for that, just an insult to a struggling club. As for the &#039;oh well, he&#039;s fouled so often anyway&#039; argument, wingers run with the ball, defenders try to tackle them, the quicker/more skilful players will often be too good for them and end up getting fouled. Pinning my colours to the mast, I&#039;m an Arsenal supporter and I watch teams chop down Roisicky and Hleb every time they try and cut inside. Hleb is currently injured as a result of it. However, there are plenty of other ways of avoiding a tackle without thowing yourself into the air and then tumbling to the ground theatrically. Defenders would regularly throw themselves into tackles on Giggs in his prime, I don&#039;t recall him going down that easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I told my cockney red mate when he started moaning after the Fulham incident that Ronaldo would have got the penalty if he&#8217;d bothered to even try and chase the ball after he&#8217;d knocked it wide of Niemi, instead of continuing running in the direction of the keeper while looking straight at him. It&#8217;s an ambiguous thing, what if a player&#8217;s played for the penalty but his opponent has nonetheless ended up obstructing him? I think even if Niemi had made contact, Ronaldo was so uninterested in getting the ball that a penalty would have been harsh. However, other players may have gotten it because they didn&#8217;t have Ronaldo&#8217;s reputation. But as the Derby incident shows, it is one that he is to blame for. There was absolutely no need for that, just an insult to a struggling club. As for the &#8216;oh well, he&#8217;s fouled so often anyway&#8217; argument, wingers run with the ball, defenders try to tackle them, the quicker/more skilful players will often be too good for them and end up getting fouled. Pinning my colours to the mast, I&#8217;m an Arsenal supporter and I watch teams chop down Roisicky and Hleb every time they try and cut inside. Hleb is currently injured as a result of it. However, there are plenty of other ways of avoiding a tackle without thowing yourself into the air and then tumbling to the ground theatrically. Defenders would regularly throw themselves into tackles on Giggs in his prime, I don&#8217;t recall him going down that easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OMelhorDoMundo</title>
		<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>OMelhorDoMundo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/#comment-980</guid>
		<description>Very sensible points, Scott. Ronaldo falls easily which damages his reputation. This then creates cases like Fulham where he is treated harshly by referees. With zero protection, he gets kicked all the time. When being kicked like he does every game, why should he stay on his feet? 
Ronaldo has never suffered a long term injury only because he won&#039;t stand his ground when two legs fly in. He&#039;ll jump (or dive, whatever you call it) to avoid it (or con the ref, your choice) which is the sensible thing to do. What he did against Derby though was completely unnecessary and as you pointed out, damaging in the long run</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very sensible points, Scott. Ronaldo falls easily which damages his reputation. This then creates cases like Fulham where he is treated harshly by referees. With zero protection, he gets kicked all the time. When being kicked like he does every game, why should he stay on his feet?<br />
Ronaldo has never suffered a long term injury only because he won&#8217;t stand his ground when two legs fly in. He&#8217;ll jump (or dive, whatever you call it) to avoid it (or con the ref, your choice) which is the sensible thing to do. What he did against Derby though was completely unnecessary and as you pointed out, damaging in the long run</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taehr</title>
		<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/#comment-974</link>
		<dc:creator>Taehr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 17:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/#comment-974</guid>
		<description>Excellent excellent article.is there no way you can publish these anywhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent excellent article.is there no way you can publish these anywhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: denton davey</title>
		<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/#comment-965</link>
		<dc:creator>denton davey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 16:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/#comment-965</guid>
		<description>Agree with Whiteside10 - the &quot;press attention&quot; shoulld be understood to be a compliment; so should the &quot;close marking&quot; to which the opposition subjects him.

But, on anohter point, just looking at these incidents (again) makes it clear that the game needs video replay.  The usual complaint by &quot;traditionalists&quot; is that video replay will stop the game BUT what about the ridiculous post-goal &quot;celebrations&quot; and the time wasted crowding the referee whenever there is a dodgy decision ?  In both of these instances, time is wasted and nothing is done about it.  In contrast, a one-minute &quot;time out&quot; for a video replay official to determine if the on-field call was correct seems justified - and the clock can be stopped for that minute.  No more; if it&#039;s inconclusive then let the on-field decision stand.

Likewise, sometimes the ref simply misses a blatant foul - that happened today when Eboue of TheArse slapped a M&#039;boro player not ten feet from the ref but the ref&#039;s view of the slap was obscured by the M&#039;boro&#039;s player&#039;s body.  How difficult would it be for the linesman or a video-replay official to buzz the head referee to let him know that something untoward has happened and that a short break in the action is called for to sort matters out.  These things don&#039;t happen often but when they do it is significant that justice should be seen to be done.

Similarly, I would like to see closer attention paid to the offsides decisions which all-too-often are incorrect and can change the flow of the game.

The EPL is a colossal enterprise but it is bedevilled by 19th-century notions of on-field officiating.  It&#039;s time for the English to re-make their game to reflect twenty-first century realities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Whiteside10 &#8211; the &#8220;press attention&#8221; shoulld be understood to be a compliment; so should the &#8220;close marking&#8221; to which the opposition subjects him.</p>
<p>But, on anohter point, just looking at these incidents (again) makes it clear that the game needs video replay.  The usual complaint by &#8220;traditionalists&#8221; is that video replay will stop the game BUT what about the ridiculous post-goal &#8220;celebrations&#8221; and the time wasted crowding the referee whenever there is a dodgy decision ?  In both of these instances, time is wasted and nothing is done about it.  In contrast, a one-minute &#8220;time out&#8221; for a video replay official to determine if the on-field call was correct seems justified &#8211; and the clock can be stopped for that minute.  No more; if it&#8217;s inconclusive then let the on-field decision stand.</p>
<p>Likewise, sometimes the ref simply misses a blatant foul &#8211; that happened today when Eboue of TheArse slapped a M&#8217;boro player not ten feet from the ref but the ref&#8217;s view of the slap was obscured by the M&#8217;boro&#8217;s player&#8217;s body.  How difficult would it be for the linesman or a video-replay official to buzz the head referee to let him know that something untoward has happened and that a short break in the action is called for to sort matters out.  These things don&#8217;t happen often but when they do it is significant that justice should be seen to be done.</p>
<p>Similarly, I would like to see closer attention paid to the offsides decisions which all-too-often are incorrect and can change the flow of the game.</p>
<p>The EPL is a colossal enterprise but it is bedevilled by 19th-century notions of on-field officiating.  It&#8217;s time for the English to re-make their game to reflect twenty-first century realities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Webber</title>
		<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/#comment-963</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Webber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 16:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/#comment-963</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m shocked, shocked i tell ya, that the boy hasn&#039;t had his legs broken by some of those horror tackles. If I was getting hacked to bits every game like that, I&#039;d go down a bit easy myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m shocked, shocked i tell ya, that the boy hasn&#8217;t had his legs broken by some of those horror tackles. If I was getting hacked to bits every game like that, I&#8217;d go down a bit easy myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whiteside10</title>
		<link>http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>Whiteside10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 16:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therepublikofmancunia.com/ronaldos-dive-can-it-be-justified/#comment-962</guid>
		<description>A lot of good points made here... I personally reckon that all this press attention should be taken as a compliment... Ronaldo is just one of many players that goes down easily in the box (you mention Gerrard), but the problem is that the press highlight his instances because I&#039;m sure they all feel that he should be better than that. My only slight criticism of Ronnie doing this is when he has a genuinely good chance of scoring anyway, which I thought was the case in the Fulham game. That&#039;s not to say that Niemi coming charging out of his goal, lifting his arms up showed intent to bring him down should have been punished, but it would also have meant having to send him off, which was a decision the referee clearly didn&#039;t have the balls for. As for the Derby game, I can only repeat your comments - Ronnie&#039;s vilified if he tries to hurdle the challenge (rumours of United bringing in Colin Jackson to take training sessions appear unfounded), so he rightly decides to run into the goalie and leave his foot in... a skill Gerrard has perfected down the years. And, as you say, he gets kicked enough every week to be given that choice. I should add finally that the press did write a lot of coverage about the non-penalty incident in the Fulham game, which may very well have influenced Chris Foy giving the decision against Derby, so it&#039;s &#039;swings and roundabouts&#039; as they say...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of good points made here&#8230; I personally reckon that all this press attention should be taken as a compliment&#8230; Ronaldo is just one of many players that goes down easily in the box (you mention Gerrard), but the problem is that the press highlight his instances because I&#8217;m sure they all feel that he should be better than that. My only slight criticism of Ronnie doing this is when he has a genuinely good chance of scoring anyway, which I thought was the case in the Fulham game. That&#8217;s not to say that Niemi coming charging out of his goal, lifting his arms up showed intent to bring him down should have been punished, but it would also have meant having to send him off, which was a decision the referee clearly didn&#8217;t have the balls for. As for the Derby game, I can only repeat your comments &#8211; Ronnie&#8217;s vilified if he tries to hurdle the challenge (rumours of United bringing in Colin Jackson to take training sessions appear unfounded), so he rightly decides to run into the goalie and leave his foot in&#8230; a skill Gerrard has perfected down the years. And, as you say, he gets kicked enough every week to be given that choice. I should add finally that the press did write a lot of coverage about the non-penalty incident in the Fulham game, which may very well have influenced Chris Foy giving the decision against Derby, so it&#8217;s &#8216;swings and roundabouts&#8217; as they say&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

