rss twitter facebook mobile

Liverpool? City? Or United? Munich Memorial Picture Vandalised

Busby Babes TributeWhilst the Munich memorial picture which hangs from the East Stand is less than perfect, with the words originally printed incorrectly and an AIG logo situated at the bottom, there is no doubting it is an impressive site. With the 50th anniversary of the tragedy approaching, much of the red focus is on our players who lost their lives on return from their pioneering trip in the European Cup.

Many United fans have voiced their displeasure at the corporate logo getting a spot on the picture, feeling AIG has no place to be associated with the occasion. As I wrote about last week, the feeling of poor taste has spread amongst United fans, and a petition, currently showing close to 2000 signatures, has circulated in an attempt to get the logo removed.

United responded to the complaints, saying, “the commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the Munich air crash has involved many different groups including the club’s partners, who wish to pay their own tributes. Each group has chosen to pay tribute in its own way. It is entirely appropriate that a partner as closely involved with the club as AIG would want to remember that extraordinary team, cut down in its prime.”

There has also been major concern of how the blue side of the city will respond to the anniversary, with the derby day game being held on February 10th. City have anticipated a poor reaction from their fans, writing pleading letters to those with tickets to the game asking them to behave for the sake of Frank Swift and his family, who will be at the match.

Today, it has been announced that the memorial picture has been vandalised with paint bombs. United have responded quickly and restored the picture, but with the strong feelings against the AIG logo, it is not possible to rule out our own extremist fans from being the guilty party.

I’d like to think that only the bitters could be capable of such a disrespectful act and imagine it is them who are behind it. If that is the case, they’ve reinforced our opinion of them being complete scumbags, who have far too many fans who disrespect the Busby Babes.

However, if it is angry United fans behind this, then it is even worse. Whatever our feelings about the AIG logo, it would be completely unacceptable to deface the picture in such a way. It was only last week that David Gill suffered the wrath of United fans, who vandalised his home with ‘Judas Gill’ and ‘Glazers Out’.

Of course, it is impossible to rule any set of fans out, with Liverpool fans being no strangers to vandalising our ground. When playing Chelsea the FA Cup semi two years ago, they covered our ground with graffiti about Munich.

Scousers

Scousers

Club spokesmen, Phil Townsend, had this to say: “A couple of paint bombs were thrown at the Munich tribute on the east stand last night. It’s just a group of mindless idiots who have vandalised a tribute to the Busby Babes.” In response to questions about the AIG logo, he said, “It’s not an advert. It’s a tribute by one of our major partners and we are entirely comfortable with it.”

Who do you think is behind it?


 

4 Comments

  1. jsos says:

    as much as i hate to say it, from the response on forums, etc, i think it’s likely one of our own. shame on them – they are a disgrace to the club as well as the true supporters with mentalities above the age of a 9 year old.

  2. mary says:

    I just think our fans in particular need to get over themselves. It is pathertic, AIG are our current sponsors. Like it or not they are a part of the club now. I think most of the fans complaining are just looking for something to moan about. We are palying nigh on the best football ever seen at Old Trafford, the best player in the world plays for us (ok probably not for the rest of his career.) yes we are in debt yes season tickets are too expensive but move on. Enjoy the football, mourn the dead but live in the present.

  3. Tom F says:

    We are living in a modern world now, everything is sponsored down to the drinks our players drink on the field I’d imagine. So although it’s not ideal I am over it because to be honest, I never noticed the AIG until it was pointed out, I was more taken away by the scale of it and the United Calypso. Busby’s name missing from it was what I noticed and was a bit annoyed about.

    No United fan would vandalise the tribute, they may call themselves United fans or consider themselves ‘guerilla Fans’ and may have something to say, well if that’s the case why don’t they go support FCUOM?

    The only word for whoever does act in that way is SCUM.

  4. Kunal says:

    FCUM

LEAVE YOUR COMMENT BELOW

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Log in with your Facebook or Twitter account: